
Risk Management and Decision-Making Practices Among School Leaders in Chivi District, Zimbabwe | IJET β Volume 12 Issue 2 | IJET-V12I2P21

Table of Contents
ToggleInternational Journal of Engineering and Techniques (IJET)
Open Access β’ Peer Reviewed β’ High Citation & Impact Factor β’ ISSN: 2395-1303
Volume 12, Issue 2 | Published: March 2026
Author: Dr. Evershine Ndongwe
DOI: https://doi.org/{{doi}} β’ PDF: Download
Abstract
This study examines how school leaders in Chivi District, Zimbabwe, perceive, prioritise, and manage risk within resource-constrained rural school environments. Drawing on risk governance theory and bounded rationality, the study explores how structural vulnerabilities shape leadership decision-making and institutional management practices. A mixed-methods design was employed, combining quantitative survey data from 60 school leaders with qualitative interviews to examine patterns of risk exposure, leadership responses, and contextual constraints affecting risk governance. The findings indicate that financial instability (88%), safety hazards (82%), and infrastructural deficits (79%) represent the most significant risks affecting school operations. While many schools implement visible safety measures such as drills and security procedures, formal governance mechanismsβincluding systematic risk assessments, financial audits, and structured community risk committeesβremain limited. Regression analysis further reveals that resource availability, risk management training, leadership experience, and stakeholder participation significantly predict risk management effectiveness, with resource availability emerging as the strongest predictor. Qualitative findings highlight additional constraints including resource scarcity, limited professional training in risk governance, bureaucratic restrictions, and weak community engagement. These conditions contribute to largely reactive leadership practices. The study introduces the concept of risk-mediated leadership, emphasising institutional stability as a priority in high-vulnerability educational contexts.
Keywords
Risk governance; School leadership; Decision-making; Rural education; Institutional resilience
Conclusion
This study examined how school leaders in Chivi District, Zimbabwe, perceive and manage institutional risks within resource-constrained rural school environments. The findings demonstrate that risk management forms a central dimension of leadership practice in contexts characterised by financial uncertainty, infrastructural challenges, and limited institutional resources.
The study revealed that financial instability, safety hazards, and deteriorating infrastructure represent the most significant risks affecting school operations. While school leaders have adopted visible safety practices such as drills and basic security measures, systematic governance mechanismsβincluding formal risk assessments, financial oversight structures, and structured community risk committeesβremain limited.
Regression analysis further indicated that resource availability, risk management training, leadership experience, and stakeholder participation significantly influence the effectiveness of school-level risk management practices. Among these factors, resource availability emerged as the strongest predictor, highlighting the importance of institutional capacity in strengthening risk governance.
The study contributes to educational leadership scholarship by introducing the concept of risk-mediated leadership, which recognises that leadership priorities in high-risk environments often emphasise institutional stability and operational resilience before instructional transformation.
Overall, the findings suggest that strengthening risk governance within rural schools requires coordinated policy support, leadership capacity development, and improved resource allocation mechanisms.
References
Aven, T., & Renn, O. (2010). Risk management and governance: Concepts, guidelines and applications. Risk Analysis, 30(10), 1423β1435. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01454.x
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Sage.
Boin, A., βt Hart, P., Stern, E., & Sundelius, B. (2017). The politics of crisis management: Public leadership under pressure (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77β101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. Q. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
Bush, T. (2018). School leadership and management in developing countries: Challenges and opportunities. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(2), 181β188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217733905
Bush, T. (2020). Theories of educational leadership and management (5th ed.). Sage.
Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2014). School leadership models: What do we know? School Leadership & Management, 34(5), 553β571. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2014.928680
Bush, T., & Oduro, G. K. T. (2006). New principals in Africa: Preparation, induction and practice. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(4), 359β375. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230610676587
Chikoko, V. (2016). The role of school heads in promoting effective community participation in rural Zimbabwe. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(3), 401β417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214558572
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2014). Resilient teachers, resilient schools: Building and sustaining quality in testing times. Routledge.
Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Fullan, M., & Quinn, J. (2016). Coherence: The right drivers in action for schools, districts, and systems. Corwin.
Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125β142. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111116699
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership & Management, 30(2), 95β110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632431003663214
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.
Harris, A. (2013). Distributed leadership: Friend or foe? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 545β554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213497635
Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2018). Leading schools as learning organizations. School Leadership & Management, 38(4), 351β354. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2018.1483553
International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 31000: Risk managementβGuidelines. ISO.
Jones, B. D. (2017). Bounded rationality. Annual Review of Political Science, 20, 1β22. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050216-092420
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5β22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
Leithwood, K., & Sun, J. (2012). The nature and effects of transformational school leadership: A meta-analytic review. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(3), 387β423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11436268
Lumby, J., & Foskett, N. (2016). International perspectives on leadership and management. Sage.
Mapolisa, T., & Tshabalala, T. (2013). Schoolβcommunity partnerships in rural Zimbabwe. Journal of Educational Studies, 12(2), 45β58.
OECD. (2013). Leadership for 21st century learning. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2019). School leadership for learning: Insights from TALIS 2018. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/2e0c5d6a-en
OECD. (2020). Education leadership and resilience. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/7d1d5f7c-en
Pashiardis, P., & Johansson, O. (2016). Successful school leadership: International perspectives. Bloomsbury.
Pont, B., Nusche, D., & Moorman, H. (2008). Improving school leadership: Policy and practice. OECD Publishing.
Renn, O. (2008). Risk governance: Coping with uncertainty in a complex world. Earthscan.
Robinson, V. (2011). Student-centered leadership. Jossey-Bass.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (2007). Rethinking leadership: A collection of articles. Corwin Press.
Shava, G. N., & Tlou, F. (2018). School leadership and governance in rural education contexts in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 60, 201β208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.10.010
Simon, H. A. (1979). Rational decision making in business organizations. American Economic Review, 69(4), 493β513.
Southworth, G. (2009). Learning-centred leadership. In B. Davies (Ed.), The essentials of school leadership (pp. 91β111). Sage.
Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass.
UNESCO. (2016). Leading better learning: School leadership and quality in education. UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2017). School leadership for learning in Africa. UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.
UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and educationβAll means all. UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO.
UNICEF. (2023). Strengthening school safety and resilience in vulnerable contexts. UNICEF.
World Bank. (2018). World development report 2018: Learning to realize educationβs promise. World Bank.
World Bank. (2021). Realizing the future of learning: From learning poverty to learning for everyone, everywhere. World Bank.
Cite this article
APA
Dr. Evershine Ndongwe (March 2026). Risk Management and Decision-Making Practices Among School Leaders in Chivi District, Zimbabwe. International Journal of Engineering and Techniques (IJET), 12(2). https://doi.org/{{doi}}
Dr. Evershine Ndongwe, βRisk Management and Decision-Making Practices Among School Leaders in Chivi District, Zimbabwe,β International Journal of Engineering and Techniques (IJET), vol. 12, no. 2, March 2026, doi: {{doi}}.
