Customer satisfaction plays a vital role in the airline industry, as it strongly influences customer loyalty, brand image, and long-term business success. This project aims to analyze airline customer satisfaction by combining Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with machine learning techniques. Customer opinion data, along with service quality indicators and demographic details, is used to identify the key factors that affect overall passenger satisfaction. A hybrid analytical approach is applied to predict and classify satisfaction levels effectively. The results show that the proposed hybrid model significantly improves prediction accuracy. Among the machine learning techniques used, the Random Forest classifier performs the best, achieving an accuracy of 92%, making it suitable for handling complex and high-dimensional airline data. Other models such as Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Decision Tree also produce reliable results, offering a comparative view of their classification performance. The integration of SEM and machine learning provides a balanced framework that supports both interpretability and accuracy. SEM helps in analyzing hidden factors such as emotional satisfaction, perceived value, and customer loyalty, while machine learning models capture complex relationships among service attributes. The study identifies important satisfaction drivers including in-flight service quality, staff behavior, ease of booking, and on-time performance. Feature selection and feature engineering further enhance model efficiency and reliability. This study also contributes to improving data-driven decision-making in airline service management. By combining structured survey data with unstructured customer reviews, the proposed model offers deeper insights into passenger behavior, preferences, and concerns. Additionally, the use of sentiment analysis strengthens real-time prediction and service optimization . Overall, the findings demonstrate that the hybrid SEM–machine learning approach is effective in analyzing and forecasting airline customer satisfaction. The results provide useful recommendations for airline management to improve customer retention, operational performance, and personalized service offerings. The proposed framework can also be extended to related sectors such as hospitality and transportation, supporting the development of smart and customer-focused business analytics systems.

This study used Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to analyze airline customer satisfaction and identify the main factors influencing passenger loyalty and perceptions. The model combined statistical techniques to evaluate how service quality, in-flight experience, support services, and pricing affect satisfaction. The findings show that SEM helps airlines understand customer expectations, recognize service gaps, and implement targeted improvements. The framework is reliable across different customer groups and can be further enhanced in future studies using real-time feedback and advanced data analysis.

[1] Choi, H. C., Huang, S., Choi, H., & Chang, H. (2020). The effect of flight attendants’ physical attractiveness on satisfaction, positive emotion, perceived value, and behavioral intention. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 44, 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.05.00 [2] Chow, C. K. W., & Fung, M. K. Y. (2018). Service quality, passenger expectations and profitability in the Chinese airline industry. In X. Fu & J. Peoples (Eds.), Airline Economics in Asia (Vol. 7, pp. 169–194). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2212-160920180000007010 [3] Cintamur, İ. G. (2023). Linking customer justice perception, customer support perception, and customer citizenship behavior to corporate reputation: Evidence from the airline industry. Corporate Reputation Review, 26(2), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-022-00141-z [4] Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum. [5] de Barros, A. G. Somasundaraswaran. A. K., & Wirasinghe . S. C. (2007). Evaluation of level of service for transfer passengers at airports. Journal of Air Transport Management, 13(5), 293–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2007.04.004 [6] DHMI. (2024). Istatistikler [Statistics]. General Directorate of State Airports Authority. https://www.dhmi.gov.tr/Sayfalar/Istatistikler.aspx [7] Ding, Y., Yang, S., Chen, Y., Long, Q., & Wei, J. (2019). Explaining and predicting mobile government microblogging services participation behaviors: A SEM-neural network method. IEEE Access, 7, 39600–39611. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2903729 [8] Ekiz, E., Hussain, K., & Bavik.A. (2006). Perceptions of service quality in North Cyprus hotels. Tourism and Hospitality Industry, 778–790. [9] Farooq, M. S., Salam, M., Fayolle, A., Jaafar, N., & Ayupp. K. (2018). Impact of service quality on customer satisfaction in Malaysia airlines: A PLS-SEM approach. Journal of Air Transport Management, 67, 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2017.12.008 [10] Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146 [11] Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312 [12] Gallarza, M. G., Gil-Saura, I., & Arteaga-Moreno, F. (2017). Exploring competing models on sacrifices, quality, value, satisfaction and loyalty. European Journal of Tourism Research, 17, 116–135. https://doi.org/10.54055/ejtr.v17i.297 [13] Gerede, E. (2015). Havayolu taşımacılığı ve ekonomik düzenlemeler: Teori ve Türkiye uygulaması. Sivil Havacılık Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları. [14] Ghotbabadi, A. R., Feiz, S., & Baharun, R. (2015). Service quality measurements: A review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 5(2), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v5-i2/1484 [15] Grönroos, C. (1984). A service quality model and its marketing implications. European Journal of Marketing, 18(4), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000004784?via%3Dihub

© 2025 International Journal of Engineering and Techniques (IJET).

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

IJET assigns a unique DOI to every accepted article via Zenodo for persistent linking and citation. Your article’s DOI: https://doi.org/{{doi}}

Open DOI About Zenodo DOI

Close