Odesa Ogaga Edward, Afolabi Awodeyi, Ugbeh Raymond Nduka, Omolegho Ibok, Idama Omokaro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23733021

AI-native sixth-generation (6G) wireless networks are envisioned to orchestrate massive populations of autonomous agents—including unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), connected autonomous vehicles (CAVs), industrial robotics, and distributed Internet of Things (IoT) nodes—that transcend traditional bit-pipe transmissions to exchange rich, task-oriented semantic representations. Extracted via advanced edge artificial intelligence (AI), transmitted across learned air interfaces, fused into shared knowledge bases, and ultimately translated into collaborative joint actions, this semantic processing pipeline is inherently vulnerable to compounding imperfections.Sensors degrade through calibration loss and environmental wear, edge inference models suffer from severe distribution shifts, semantic encoders and decoders experience mutual misalignment, wireless channels distort latent feature spaces, knowledge bases diverge across heterogeneous vendors, and malicious or faulty Byzantine peers inject persistent false beliefs. We formally define the resulting gradual degradation of alignment between representation and reality, as well as inter-agent consensus divergence, as semantic drift.This comprehensive review traces the entire sensing-to-decision pipeline across seven distinct stages(S1→ S7) . We introduce a rigorous stage-wise formalization accompanied by an end-to-end analytical error bound demonstrating how localized errors propagate and amplify downstream. Furthermore, we present a structured detect–prevent–correct–contain taxonomy of mitigation mechanisms for each stage, evaluate numerical models contrasting vulnerable linear consensus with Byzantine-resilient fusion, outline a closed-loop cross-stage management architecture with joint resource allocation formulations, consolidate evaluation metrics, and articulate open research challenges.

Semantic drift, AI-native 6G, semantic communication, edge AI, multi-agent systems, federated learning, Byzantine-resilient consensus, age of incorrect information.

Semantic drift represents an inherent systemic challenge across the entire sensing-to-decision chain in AI-native 6G multi-agent networks. By establishing rigorous stage-wise error bounds, deploying Byzantine-resilient consensus protocols [4], and implementing closed-loop cross-stage coordination architectures [6], distributed autonomous systems can achieve unprecedented levels of operational reliability and semantic fidelity.

[1] K. B. Letaief, Y. Shi, J. Lu, and J. Lu, "Edge artificial intelligence for 6G: Vision, enabling technologies, and applications," IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 5–36, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsac.2021.3126076
[2] Yang, W., Du, H., Liew, Z. Q., Lim, W. Y. B., Xiong, Z., Niyato, D., Chi, X., Shen, X. S., & Miao, C. (2023). Semantic communications for future internet: Fundamentals, applications, and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 25(1), 213–250.https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2022.3223224
[3] A. Maatouk, S. Kriouile, M. Assaad, and A. Ephremides, "The age of incorrect information: A new performance metric for status updates," IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 2215–2228, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1109/TNET.2020.3005549
[4] H. J. LeBlanc, H. Zhang, X. Koutsoukos, and S. Sundaram, "Resilient asymptotic consensus in robust networks," IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 766–781, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsac.2013.130413
[5] P. Kairouz et al., "Advances and open problems in federated learning," Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning, vol. 14, no. 1–2, pp. 1–210, 2021. https://doi.10.1561/2200000083.
[6] L. U. Khan, Z. Han, W. Saad, E. Hossain, M. Guizani, and C. S. Hong, "Digital twin of wireless systems: Overview, taxonomy, challenges, and opportunities," IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 2230–2254, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2022.3198273
[7] Liu, F., Cui, Y., Masouros, C., Xu, J., Han, T. X., Eldar, Y. C., & Buzzi, S. (2022). Integrated sensing and communications: Toward dual-functional wireless networks for 6G and beyond. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 40(6), 1728–1767. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2022.3156632
[8] H. Xie, Z. Qin, G. Y. Li, and B.-H. Juang, "Deep learning enabled semantic communication systems," IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 69, pp. 2663–2675, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2021.3071210
[9] Y. Gal and Z. Ghahramani, "Dropout as a Bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning," in Proc. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2016, pp. 1050–1059. https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.02142
[10] A. Gretton, K. M. Borgwardt, M. J. Rasch, B. Schölkopf, and A. Smola, "A kernel two-sample test," Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 13, no. 25, pp. 723–773, 2012. https://jmlr.org/papers/v13/gretton12a.html
[11] Wang, D., Shelhamer, E., Liu, S., Olshausen, B., & Darrell, T. (2021). Tent: Fully test-time adaptation by entropy minimization. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). https://openreview.net/forum?id=uXl3bZLkr3c
[12] A. A. Alemi, I. Fischer, J. V. Dillon, and K. Murphy, "Deep variational information bottleneck," in Proc. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2017. https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.00410
[13] R. Xu, H. Xiang, X. Tu, X. Xia, M.-H. Yang, and J. Ma, "V2X-ViT: Vehicle-to-everything cooperative perception with vision transformer," in Proc. European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2022, pp. 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19842-7_7
[14] Blanchard, P., El Mhamdi, E. M., Guerraoui, R., & Stainer, J. (2017). Machine learning with adversaries: Byzantine tolerant gradient descent. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 119–129. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/hash/f4b9ec30ad9f68f89b29639786cb62ef-Abstract.html
[15] S. J. Julier and J. K. Uhlmann, "A non-divergent estimation algorithm in the presence of unknown correlations," in Proc. American Control Conference, 1997, pp. 2369–2373. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/609105

Odesa Ogaga Edward, Afolabi Awodeyi, Ugbeh Raymond Nduka, Omolegho Ibok, Idama Omokaro (2026). Semantic Drift in AI-Native 6G Multi-Agent Systems: A Systematic Review and Taxonomy of Mitigation Strategies. International Journal of Engineering and Techniques, 12(5), 410–422. ISSN: 2395-1303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23733021