Collapsible loess deposits in semi-arid regions present significant geotechnical challenges due to their sensitivity to moisture fluctuations. This study investigates the hydro-mechanical behavior of loess soil from Chandwaji, Rajasthan, by characterizing its suction properties across a range of moisture contents from dry-of-optimum (OMC-4%) to wet-of-optimum (OMC+4%). Using the filter paper method (ASTM D5298-10), both total and matric suction were measured to decouple the contributions of capillary and osmotic forces to the soil’s stability. The results demonstrate a profound reduction in soil energy potential upon wetting: Total suction decreased from 2,287 kPa at OMC-4% to 22.2 kPa at OMC+4%. A critical transition was observed at the OMC-2% state, where matric suction dropped sharply to 116 kPa while total suction remained high at 903 kPa, revealing that osmotic suction (787 kPa) becomes the dominant stabilizing force (87% contribution) in this transition zone. This finding suggests that the collapse mechanism in semi-arid loess is driven not only by the loss of capillary tension but also significantly by the dissolution of soluble salts. The study highlights the necessity of accounting for both suction components in settlement prediction models, as neglecting the osmotic component may underestimate the collapse potential of soils in arid environments.

This study investigated the suction characteristics of collapsible loess from Western India. Based on the experimental results, the following conclusions are drawn: 1.Inverse Relationship: Total suction exhibits a clear inverse relationship with moisture content, decreasing from 2,287 kPa in the dry state to 22 kPa at near-saturation. 2.Dominance of Osmotic Suction: In the critical transition zone (OMC-2%), osmotic suction accounts for 87% of the total suction. This contradicts the common assumption that matric suction is the sole governing parameter in unsaturated loess. 3.Collapse Vulnerability: The rapid loss of matric suction at low moisture contents, followed by the loss of osmotic suction at higher moisture contents, creates a two-stage vulnerability to collapse. 4.Design Recommendation: Settlement predictions in semi-arid loess must account for the degradation of both capillary and chemical bonds. Tensiometers alone are insufficient for characterizing the full stability profile of these soils; total suction measurement (via filter paper or psychrometers) is essential.

[1] ASTM D5298-10 (2010). Standard Test Method for Measurement of Soil Potential (Suction) Using Filter Paper. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. [2] Fredlund, D. G., Morgenstern, N. R., & Widger, R. A. (1978). The shear strength of unsaturated soils. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 15(3), 313–321. [3] Barden, L., Madedor, A. O., & Sides, G. R. (1969). Volume change characteristics of unsaturated clays. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 95(SM1), 33–51. [4] Fookes, P. G., & Parry, R. H. (1994). Collapsible soils. Engineering Geology, 37(2), 91–95. [5] Fredlund, D. G. (1987). Comparison of soil suction and one-dimensional compression characteristics of predicted and experimental results for expansive clay. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Expansive Soils (pp. 268–272). [6] Fredlund, D. G., & Gan, J. K. M. (1994). The collapse mechanism of partially saturated soil. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering (Vol. 2, pp. 429–432). New Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publishing. [7] Fredlund, D. G., & Morgenstern, N. R. (1977). Stress state variables for unsaturated soils. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 103(GT5), 447–466. [8] Fredlund, D. G., & Rahardjo, H. (1993). Soil mechanics for unsaturated soils. John Wiley & Sons, New York. [9] Houston, S. L. (1995). Foundations on collapsible soils. Soils and Foundations, 35(1), 131–141. [10] Houston, S. L., Houston, W. N., & Wagner, A. M. (2001). Laboratory filter paper suction measurements. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 24(3), 191–199. [11] Jennings, J. E., & Knight, K. (1975). A guide to construction on or with materials exhibiting additional settlement due to “collapse” of grain structure. In Proceedings of the 6th Regional Conference for Africa on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering (pp. 99–105). [12] Lytton, R. L., Aubeny, C. P., & Bulut, R. (2005). Design procedure for pavements on expansive soils. Transportation Research Record, 1916, 18–27. [13] Ng, C. W. W., & Menzies, B. (2007). Advanced unsaturated soil mechanics and engineering. Taylor & Francis, London. [14] Rahardjo, H., & Leong, E. C. (2006). Suction measurements. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Unsaturated Soils (pp. 81–104). ASCE. [15] Rahardjo, H., Leong, E. C., & Vanapalli, S. K. (2008). Mechanics of unsaturated soils and their application to geotechnical engineering. In Advances in Geotechnical Engineering: The Skempton Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 349–380). London: Thomas Telford. [16] Rogers, C. D. F. (1995). Types and distribution of collapsible soils. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Unsaturated Soils (pp. 145–177). Paris: A.A. Balkema. [17] Indian Standard IS 2720-2 (1973). Code of Practice for the Preparation of Dry Process Vibrated Soil Stabilized Bricks. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. [18] Indian Standard IS 2720-3 (1980). Methods of Test for Soils – Determination of Specific Gravity – Part 3. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. [19] Indian Standard IS 2720-4 (1985). Methods of Test for Soils – Sieve Analysis – Part 4. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. [20] Indian Standard IS 2720-5 (1985). Methods of Test for Soils – Determination of Liquid and Plastic Limit – Part 5. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. [21] Indian Standard IS 2720-7 (1980). Methods of Test for Soils – Determination of Water Content-Dry Density Relation using Light Compaction – Part 7. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. [22] Indian Standard IS 2720-14 (1983). Methods of Test for Soils – Determination of Density Index (Relative Density) – Part 14. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. [23] Indian Standard IS 2720-15 (1986). Methods of Test for Soils – Determination of Consolidation Index – Part 15. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. [24] Caicedo, B., Yamin, L. E., Martinez, A., & Ovando, E. (2013). On the occurrence and engineering properties of collapsible soils in Latin America. In Advanced Unsaturated Soil Mechanics and Engineering (pp. 417–450). CRC Press. [25] Jefferson, I., & Ahmad, N. (2007). Collapsible soils: Issues for urban development. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the Mechanics of Unsaturated Soils (pp. 281–308). [26] Li, Z., Zhang, Y., & Liu, S. (2016). Collapse and wetting-induced settlement characteristics of compacted loess in the Yellow River region. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 8(4), 541–553. [27] Maswoswe, J. (1985). Lateral earth pressure due to backfill subject to surcharge loading. University of Alberta, PhD Thesis. [28] Purwana, Y. M. (2017). Laboratory work on total suction calibration curve for Whatman #42 filter paper. Jurnal Riset Rekayasa Sipil, 1(1), 1–10. [29] Esmaili, D., & Hatami, K. (2017). Comparative study of measured suction in fine-grained soil using different in-situ and laboratory techniques. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 3:27, 1–9. [30] Al-Mufty, A. A. (1997). Foundation engineering in variable climate zones. Routledge Publishers. [31] Vanapalli, S. K., Fredlund, D. G., & Pufahl, D. E. (1996). The influence of soil structure and stress history on the soil-water characteristics of a compacted till. Géotechnique, 46(3), 369–378.

© 2025 International Journal of Engineering and Techniques (IJET).

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

IJET assigns a unique DOI to every accepted article via Zenodo for persistent linking and citation. Your article’s DOI: https://doi.org/{{doi}}

Open DOI About Zenodo DOI

Close