Textile Reinforced Concrete (TRC) has emerged as an effective solution for the repair and strengthening of reinforced concrete (RC) beams due to its high tensile strength, corrosion resistance, and compatibility with cementitious matrices. This paper presents an experimental framework for strengthening RC beams using TRC systems, focusing on their application in flexural repair and rehabilitation. The proposed framework outlines material selection, textile configuration, surface preparation techniques, strengthening methodology, and testing procedures for evaluating the structural performance of TRC-strengthened RC beams. Key performance parameters such as load-carrying capacity, stiffness enhancement, crack control behavior, and failure modes are identified for systematic assessment. The framework is intended to provide a structured approach for investigating the effectiveness of TRC in strengthening applications and to support future experimental studies aimed at improving the durability and structural performance of RC beams. The outcomes of this study are expected to contribute to the development of efficient and sustainable strengthening techniques for existing reinforced concrete structures.

Textile Reinforced Concrete (TRC) has emerged as a promising solution for the repair and strengthening of reinforced concrete (RC) beams, offering advantages such as corrosion resistance, improved fire performance, and enhanced compatibility with concrete substrates. Based on the comprehensive literature review and the proposed experimental framework, the following conclusions can be drawn: 1.TRC strengthening significantly improves the flexural capacity, stiffness, and crack control of RC beams, with reported strength enhancements ranging from 30% to 60%. 2.The textile reinforcement effectively bridges cracks, leading to finer crack patterns and improved durability. 3.TRC systems exhibit more ductile failure behaviour compared to FRP systems, providing safer and more reliable structural performance. 4.Carbon textiles offer superior strength and stiffness, while glass and basalt textiles provide cost-effective alternatives with satisfactory performance. 5.The cementitious matrix used in TRC ensures better fire resistance, environmental compatibility, and long-term durability compared to epoxy-based FRP systems. 6.The proposed experimental framework provides a structured approach for evaluating the flexural behaviour of TRC-strengthened RC beams and can support future research and design development. Despite the demonstrated advantages, further research is required to establish standardized design procedures, evaluate long-term durability under aggressive environmental conditions, and validate performance through full-scale field applications. TRC has strong potential to contribute to sustainable infrastructure rehabilitation and the extension of service life of aging RC structures.

[1] American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2021 Infrastructure Report Card – Bridges, Reston, VA, USA, 2021. [2] A. Sahly, J. G. Teng, and J. Chen, “Flexural strengthening of RC beams using basalt textile reinforced mortar,” Composite Structures, vol. 106, pp. 71–80, 2013. [3] C. Papanicolaou, T. Triantafillou, M. Lekka, and M. Karlos, “Textile reinforced mortar (TRM) versus FRP as strengthening material of RC beams in shear,” Journal of Composites for Construction, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 04014056, 2015. [4] Z. Tetta, D. Bournas, and T. Triantafillou, “Textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) versus fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP) in shear strengthening of RC beams,” Composites Part B: Engineering, vol. 98, pp. 338–348, 2016. [5] D. Bournas, Z. Tetta, and T. Triantafillou, “Seismic strengthening of RC columns using TRC jackets,” Engineering Structures, vol. 147, pp. 184–197, 2017. [6] J. Hegger, J. Voss, and J. Schneider, “Textile reinforced concrete for strengthening and repair,” Structural Concrete, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1225–1238, 2018. [7] T. Triantafillou, C. Papanicolaou, Z. Tetta, and M. Karlos, “Fire behavior of textile reinforced mortar strengthened RC members,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 91, pp. 87–98, 2018. [8] M. Curbach, J. Jesse, and A. Stark, “Innovative textile reinforced concrete structures,” Structural Concrete, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 88–99, 2019. [9] P. Colajanni, A. Recupero, and N. Spinella, “Experimental behavior of RC beams strengthened with textile reinforced concrete,” Materials, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1823, 2020. [10] Y. A. Al-Salloum, A. H. Almusallam, and S. H. Alsayed, “Durability of textile reinforced mortar systems under aggressive environments,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 04021048, 2021. [11] S. Yin, X. Zhang, and Y. Wang, “Hybrid textile reinforced concrete systems for structural strengthening,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 322, pp. 126460, 2022. [12] J. Zeng, L. Li, and H. Wu, “Flexural behavior of RC beams strengthened with PVA-modified TRM,” Structures, vol. 45, pp. 610–620, 2023.

© 2025 International Journal of Engineering and Techniques (IJET).

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

IJET assigns a unique DOI to every accepted article via Zenodo for persistent linking and citation. Your article’s DOI: https://doi.org/{{doi}}

Open DOI About Zenodo DOI

Close