
A Review of Multi-Modal Cancer Detection Systems: Advances in Early Diagnosis | IJET Volume 12 – Issue 3 | IJET-V12I3P42

Table of Contents
ToggleInternational Journal of Engineering and Techniques (IJET)
Open Access • Peer Reviewed • High Citation & Impact Factor • ISSN: 2395-1303
Volume 12, Issue 3} | Published: May 2026
Author: Ms. Nisha Wagh, Mr. S. G. Shah
DOI: https://doi.org/{{doi}} • PDF: Download
Abstract
Early and accurate cancer detection continues to rely heavily on advances in artificial intelligence, particularly deep learning and machine-learning systems designed for multimodal imaging and clinical data analysis. Recent studies in breast cancer diagnosis highlight the growing efficiency of lightweight CNN architectures such as MobileNetV3, Xception, and hybrid CNN–SVM models in classifying ultrasound and histopathological images, with several approaches demonstrating high accuracy and robustness despite limited and variable datasets. Parallel developments in liver cancer research show significant improvements through CNN-based CT segmentation frameworks, multiparametric ultrasound techniques, and hybrid optimization-driven classifiers, all enabling better lesion characterization and early disease detection. Similarly, thyroid cancer diagnostics benefit from enhanced YOLO-based detectors, attention-guided CNNs, and classical ML models, which collectively improve nodule classification using ultrasound or biopsy images. Additionally, multi-cancer prediction frameworks using MRI and structured clinical datasets show the promising role of SVM and ensemble learning in generalized cancer risk assessment. Across all modalities, these studies emphasize the importance of integrating deep learning with IoT infrastructure, multi-source transfer learning, and optimization algorithms to address noise, data imbalance, and limited imaging quality. Together, the reviewed works demonstrate how multimodal AI-driven systems are driving a shift towards faster, more reliable and resource-efficient cancer detection technologies, ultimately supporting early diagnosis and broader accessibility in clinical and underserved settings.
Keywords
Convolutional Neural Network, Support Vector Machine, MobileNetV3, Xception, Hybrid CNN-SVM, YOLO, Deep Learning, Cancer Detection.
Conclusion
In this review, we examined a wide range of multimodal cancer detection approaches used for breast, liver, and thyroid cancer diagnosis. The studies covered diverse imaging modalities—including histopathology, ultrasound, CT, MRI, and biopsy images—along with deep learning, traditional machine-learning models, hybrid frameworks, and optimization-based classifiers. Each method demonstrated distinct strengths in feature extraction, lesion classification, segmentation accuracy, and computational efficiency.
This review also summarized the different algorithms, performance metrics, preprocessing strategies, and architectures used across the literature, highlighting how advancements such as lightweight CNNs, transfer learning, hybrid CNN–SVM systems, and multiparametric imaging have contributed to improved early detection outcomes. Despite these improvements, several challenges persist, particularly related to dataset imbalance, imaging noise, modality-specific variability, and limited real-time deployment in resource-constrained settings.
A key research gap identified in this work is the absence of a unified, generalized diagnostic model capable of accepting any type of medical image and reliably predicting any cancer type. Current systems remain highly specialized and restricted to specific organs or imaging modalities, limiting their scalability and clinical applicability. This gap opens opportunities for future research to explore universal, multimodal frameworks integrating cross-domain learning, multi-task architectures, and large-scale standardized datasets.
Overall, this review provides valuable insights into existing multimodal cancer detection technologies while emphasizing the need for more holistic, interoperable, and clinically adaptable AI solutions for early cancer diagnosis.
References
[1]P. Kaushik and P. Sharma, “A MobileNetV3-Based Approach to Breast Cancer Detection Through Transfer Learning and Histopathological Image Analysis,” 2024 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication and Materials (ICACCM), Dehradun, India, 2024, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/ICACCM61117.2024.11059095.
[2]P. Kaushik and P. Sharma, “Breast Cancer Detection using MobileNetV3: A Deep Learning Approach for Ultrasound Image Classification,” 2025 Fourth International Conference on Power, Control and Computing Technologies (ICPC2T), Raipur, India, 2025, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1109/ICPC2T63847.2025.10958661.
[3]A. K. Dwivedi, A. Yadav and R. S. Gamad, “Breast Cancer Disease Prediction using Convolutional Neural Networks with Ultrasound Image Dataset for Healthcare-IOT Application,” 2025 4th OPJU International Technology Conference (OTCON), Raigarh, India, 2025, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/OTCON65728.2025.11070903.
[4]M. I. Rosadi, C. Fatichah and A. Yuniarti, “Breast Cancer Ultrasound Images Classification Using Hybrid Pre-Trained CNN and SVM,” 2025 17th International Conference on Knowledge and Smart Technology (KST), Bangkok, Thailand, 2025, pp. 231-236, doi: 10.1109/KST65016.2025.11003377.
[5]R. Sivakumar, “Deep Learning-Based Automated Breast Cancer Ultrasound Image Classification: A Study,” 2025 Eleventh International Conference on Bio Signals, Images, and Instrumentation (ICBSII), Chennai, India, 2025, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1109/ICBSII65145.2025.11013993.
[6]F. I. Mir, G. Raj, K. Lata and A. S. Verma, “Deep Data Analysis for Liver Cancer Prediction Using Machine Learning Approaches,” 2024 1st International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication and Networking (ICAC2N), Greater Noida, India, 2024, pp. 864-870, doi: 10.1109/ICAC2N63387.2024.10895272.
[7]Z. Naaqvi, S. Akbar, S. A. Hassan and Q. Ul Ain, “Detection of Liver Cancer through Computed Tomography Images using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks,” 2022 2nd International Conference on Digital Futures and Transformative Technologies (ICoDT2), Rawalpindi, Pakistan, 2022, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/ICoDT255437.2022.9787429.
[8]L. Basavarajappa, J. Li, H. Tai, J. Song, K. J. Parker and K. Hoyt, “Early Detection of Liver Steatosis using Multiparametric Ultrasound Imaging,” 2021 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), Xi’an, China, 2021, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1109/IUS52206.2021.9593500.
[9]W. G. Negassa, S. Mishra and H. D. Bizuneh, “Liver Tumor Detection and Classification Using GWO-ELM Model,” 2023 International Conference in Advances in Power, Signal, and Information Technology (APSIT), Bhubaneswar, India, 2023, pp. 526-531, doi: 10.1109/APSIT58554.2023.10201687.
[10]H. Zhang et al., “Multi-Source Transfer Learning Via Multi-Kernel Support Vector Machine Plus for B-Mode Ultrasound-Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Liver Cancers,” IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 3874-3885, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2021.3073812.
[11]D. Yang et al., “Automatic Thyroid Nodule Detection in Ultrasound Imaging With Improved YOLOv5 Neural Network,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 22662-22670, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3359367.
[12]T. A. Vu, N. A. Huyen, H. Q. Huy and P. T. V. Huong, “Enhancing Thyroid Cancer Detection Through Machine Learning Approach,” 2023 12th International Conference on Control, Automation and Information Sciences (ICCAIS), Hanoi, Vietnam, 2023, pp. 188-193, doi: 10.1109/ICCAIS59597.2023.10382297.
[13]C. Kaushik Viknesh, S. Kanimozhi and R. Thirumalai Selvi, “Investigation of Thyroid Nodule Detection Using Ultrasound Images with Deep Learning,” 2024 Tenth International Conference on Bio Signals, Images, and Instrumentation (ICBSII), Chennai, India, 2024, pp. 1-7, doi: 10.1109/ICBSII61384.2024.10564034.
[14]Z. Ilkilic Aytac, I. Iseri and B. Dandil, “Thyroid Cancer Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks,” 2023 2nd International Engineering Conference on Electrical, Energy, and Artificial Intelligence (EICEEAI), Zarqa, Jordan, 2023, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1109/EICEEAI60672.2023.10590377.
[15]X. Yang and G. Zhu, “Ultrasound-based discrimination of thyroid cancer based on deep learning,” 2024 5th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Electromechanical Automation (AIEA), Shenzhen, China, 2024, pp. 939-943, doi: 10.1109/AIEA62095.2024.10692904.
[16]S. R, S. R. Navaneethakrishnan, R. B, K. S. Balamurugan and M. Sudhagar, “Machine Learning in Oncology: SVM-Based Classification of Lung, Breast and Liver Cancer from MRI Scans,” 2024 IEEE 9th International Conference on Engineering Technologies and Applied Sciences (ICETAS), Bahrain, 2024, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/ICETAS62372.2024.11119794.
C. Rokde, P. Kharwandikar, A. Kungwani and A. R. Dudhe, “Predictive Modeling for Early Cancer Detection: A Machine Learning Approach to Prostate, Lung, and Breast Cancer,” 2024 2nd DMIHER International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare, Education and Industry (IDICAIEI), Wardha, India, 2024, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/IDICAIEI61867.2024.10842741
Cite this article
APA
Ms. Nisha Wagh, Mr. S. G. Shah (May 2026). A Review of Multi-Modal Cancer Detection Systems: Advances in Early Diagnosis. International Journal of Engineering and Techniques (IJET), 12(3). https://doi.org/{{doi}}
Ms. Nisha Wagh, Mr. S. G. Shah, “A Review of Multi-Modal Cancer Detection Systems: Advances in Early Diagnosis,” International Journal of Engineering and Techniques (IJET), vol. 12, no. 3, May 2026, doi: {{doi}}.
