
ENHANCED THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF A DOUBLE PIPE HEAT EXCHANGER USING MONO AND HYBRID NANOFLUIDS: A CFD STUDY | IJET â Volume 12 Issue 2 | IJET-V12I2P164

Table of Contents
ToggleInternational Journal of Engineering and Techniques (IJET)
Open Access ⢠Peer Reviewed ⢠High Citation & Impact Factor ⢠ISSN: 2395-1303
Volume 12, Issue 2 | Published: April 2026
Author: Nemali Rajesh Kumar Reddy, Dr.k.Bharradwaja
DOI: https://doi.org/{{doi}} ⢠PDF: Download
Abstract
Heat exchangers play a very crucial role in thermal system, and they are common in industrial, power generation, and HVAC operations. Nevertheless, the thermal efficiency of traditional double pipe heat exchanger (DPHE) tends to be impaired by low thermal conductivity of low thermal conductivity of base fluids like water. This paper elaborates a numerical research on the thermal and hydraulic characteristics of a counter-flow DPHE with the help of mono and hybrid nanofluids. The MXene, CuO, and hybrid CuO-SiO 2 nanofluids are subjected to simulations on their heat transfer at low volume concentrations of 0.02 per cent and 0.04 per cent in computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). The findings prove that nanofluids have great heat transfer capabilities when compared with pure water. Out of all the cases the maximum overall heat transfer coefficient and heat transfer rate are at 0.04% of CuO -SiO2 hybrid nanofluid. As small a pressure drop increase is noted, however the gain in thermal performance overrides the hydraulic penalty. The results lead to the evidence of the promising character of progressed nanofluids in enhancing energy efficiency in heat exchanger systems.
Keywords
Double Pipe Heat Exchanger, Nanofluids, Hybrid Nanofluids, MXene, CFD, Heat Transfer Enhancement
Conclusion
This paper has shown that mono and hybrid nanofluid integrations are a major advancement to thermal efficiency of the double pipe heat exchanger over the traditional base fluids. Nanoparticles enhance thermophysical characteristics, which leads to increasing the rates of heat transfer and efficient performance. The CuO-SiO2 hybrid nanofluid concentration of 0.04% gives the best performance in the test among the tested fluids since the nanoparticles will have synergistic effects.
Even though the pressure drop increase is minimal, the thermal gain is greater than the hydraulic penalty. The results validate the assumption that nanofluids present an appropriate solution when it comes to enhancing the efficiency and energy performance of heat exchangers in industries.
References
1.Choi, S. U. S. (1995). Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. ASME FED, 231, 99â105.
2.Eastman, J. A., Choi, S. U. S., Li, S., Yu, W., & Thompson, L. J. (2001). Anomalously increased thermal conductivity of nanofluids. Applied Physics Letters, 78(6), 718â720.
3.Do, K. H., Jang, S. P., & Kim, S. J. (2010). Effect of nanofluids on thermal performance. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 53(25â26), 5883â5891.
4.Prakash, R., & Kumar, R. (2015). CFD analysis of AlâOâ nanofluid in DPHE. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 91, 166â175.
5.Alhulaifi, A. (2019). Heat transfer enhancement using TiOâ nanofluids. Applied Thermal Engineering, 148, 115â125.
6.Qasim, M., et al. (2021). Hybrid nanofluid heat transfer. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 25, 100â110.
7.Incropera, F. P., DeWitt, D. P. (2007). Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer. Wiley.
8.Bergman, T. L., Lavine, A. S. (2011). Introduction to Heat Transfer. Wiley.
9.Wang, X., & Mujumdar, A. S. (1999). Heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 46(1), 1â19.
10.Das, S. K., Choi, S. U. S., & Patel, H. E. (2006). Heat transfer in nanofluids. Annual Review of Heat Transfer, 14, 1â45.
11.Keblinski, P., Eastman, J. A., & Cahill, D. G. (2005). Mechanisms of heat transfer in nanofluids. Materials Today, 8(6), 36â44.
12.Huminic, G., & Huminic, A. (2015). Application of nanofluids in heat exchangers. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 49, 131â143.
13.Li, Q., Xuan, Y., & Wang, J. (2013). Investigation on graphene nanofluids. Carbon, 65, 104â112.
14.Baby, T. T., & Ramaprabhu, S. (2011). Experimental investigation of graphene nanofluids. Journal of Applied Physics, 110(6), 064308.
15.Naguib, M., et al. (2012). MXene materials for thermal applications. Advanced Materials, 24(7), 992â1005.
16.Kole, M., & Dey, T. K. (2012). Thermal conductivity of graphene oxide nanofluids. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 40, 54â61.
17.Yu, W., & Xie, H. (2008). Review on nanofluids. Journal of Nanomaterials, 2008, 435873.
18.Kakac, S., & Yener, Y. (1991). Boiling Heat Transfer. CRC Press.
19.Bejan, A. (2003). Heat Transfer Handbook. Wiley.
Sarafraz, M. M., et al. (2018). Thermosyphon performance using nanofluids. Energy Conversion and Management, 172, 108â127.
Cite this article
APA
Nemali Rajesh Kumar Reddy, Dr.k.Bharradwaja (April 2026). ENHANCED THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF A DOUBLE PIPE HEAT EXCHANGER USING MONO AND HYBRID NANOFLUIDS: A CFD STUDY. International Journal of Engineering and Techniques (IJET), 12(2). https://doi.org/{{doi}}
Nemali Rajesh Kumar Reddy, Dr.k.Bharradwaja, âENHANCED THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF A DOUBLE PIPE HEAT EXCHANGER USING MONO AND HYBRID NANOFLUIDS: A CFD STUDY,â International Journal of Engineering and Techniques (IJET), vol. 12, no. 2, April 2026, doi: {{doi}}.
