
Coordinated Operation of Custom Power Devices for Enhanced Voltage Quality and Harmonic Mitigation in Smart Distribution Networks | IJET Volume 12 β Issue 3 | IJET-V12I3P83

Table of Contents
ToggleInternational Journal of Engineering and Techniques (IJET)
Open Access β’ Peer Reviewed β’ High Citation & Impact Factor β’ ISSN: 2395-1303
Volume 12, Issue 3 | Published: June 2026
Author: Kripa Shanker, Dr. Dharmendra Kumar Singh
DOI: https://doi.org/{{doi}} β’ PDF: Download
Abstract
This work presents a novel custom power device (CPD) designed for dynamic management of reactive power and enhancement of voltage quality in smart grid (SG) systems under both fundamental and harmonic conditions. The approach utilizes real-time data obtained from smart meters installed at each bus and communicated to the smart grid central controller (SGCC). Based on this information, the CPD simultaneously performs the functions of a static synchronous compensator (STATCOM) and an active power line conditioner (APLC) by optimally compensating fundamental reactive power and harmonic currents at strategically selected buses.
The proposed methodology incorporates two particle swarm optimization (PSO) techniques. The first PSO algorithm is applied under worst-case operating scenarios to identify optimal placement and sizing of CPDs. The second PSO algorithm leverages continuous smart meter data to generate real-time reference signals for both fundamental and harmonic compensation, ensuring effective control of the installed CPDs.
The optimization objectives include minimizing costs related to voltage profile improvement, total harmonic distortion of voltage (THDv), and device sizing, subject to constraints such as maximum CPD capacity and permissible limits of fundamental and harmonic bus voltages. Comprehensive simulations are carried out using MATLAB/Simulink to validate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. The system performance is tested on a distorted 15-bus smart grid with six nonlinear loads, ensuring compliance with IEEE-519 standards.
Keywords
Custom Power Device (CPD), Static Synchronous Compensator (STATCOM), Active Power Line Conditioner (APLC), Reactive Power Compensation, Harmonic Mitigation, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO).
Conclusion
The main conclusions drawn from the detailed simulations of the 15-bus distorted smart grid (SG) with six nonlinear loads (Figs. 7β8) are summarized as follows:
β’ The application of multiple CPDs, incorporating both STATCOM and APLC functionalities, effectively maintains the THDv of all buses within the permissible limit of 5%, while simultaneously regulating the fundamental bus voltages above the minimum acceptable limit of 0.9 pu (Tables 3β4, Fig. 10).
β’ The optimal number, sizes, and locations of CPDs depend on the SG configuration, constraint limits, and the number, types, and locations of nonlinear loads. The objective function weighting factors (Eq. (9)) significantly influence the siting and sizing results (Table 7). Larger values of Wsizelead to solutions with more CPDs but smaller total capacity, with THDv values approaching the upper limit of 5%. In contrast, higher values of WTHDyield lower THDv levels but require a larger number of CPDs, increasing installation and maintenance costs. Therefore, equal weighting factors WsizeWTHD0.5are recommended to achieve a balanced trade-off.
β’ The optimally allocated CPDs significantly enhance SG performance by enabling real-time control of network THDv and fundamental bus voltages Vfundunder varying operating conditions (Table 8, Figs. 9β10).
β’ The allocated CPDs can also be operated in a coordinated manner to function as either STATCOMs or APLCs in real time, enabling control of reactive power (and hence voltage regulation) at the fundamental frequency or mitigation of harmonic distortions across the network, as demonstrated in Tables 5 and 6, respectively.
References
[1] F. Rahimi and A. Ipakchi, βDemand response as a market resource under the smart grid paradigm,β IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 82β88, 2010.
[2] B. D. Russell and C. L. Benner, βIntelligent systems for improved reliability and failure diagnosis in distribution systems,β IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 48β56, 2010.
[3] K. Moslehi and R. Kumar, βA reliability perspective of the smart grid,β IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 57β64, 2010.
[4] C. A. CaΓ±izares and F. L. Alvarado, βPoint of collapse and continuation methods for large AC/DC systems,β IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, pp. 1β8, 1993.
[5] R. C. Dugan, M. F. McGranaghan, and H. W. Beaty, Electrical Power Systems Quality. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1996.
[6] O. Anaya-Lara and E. Acha, βModeling and analysis of custom power systems by PSCAD/EMTDC,β IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 266β272, 2002.
[7] N. G. Hingorani and L. Gyugyi, Understanding FACTS: Concepts and Technology of Flexible AC Transmission Systems. New York, NY, USA: IEEE Press, 2000.
[8] P. H. Mohammadi and M. T. Bina, βA transformerless medium-voltage STATCOM topology based on extended modular multilevel converters,β IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1534β1545, 2011.
[9] E. F. Fuchs and M. A. S. Masoum, Power Quality in Electrical Machines and Power Systems, 2nd ed. USA: Academic Press (Elsevier), 2015.
[10] IEEE Recommended Practices and Requirements for Harmonic Control in Electrical Power Systems, IEEE Std 519-1992, 1993.
[11] B. Singh, K. Al-Haddad, and A. Chandra, βA review of active filters for power quality improvement,β IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 960β971, 1999.
[12] D. D. Sabin and A. Sannino, βA summary of the draft IEEE P1409 custom power application guide,β IEEE PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition, vol. 3, pp. 931β936, 2003. [Online]. Available: http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1409/0309_sannino.pdf
[13] Y. Y. Hong and Y. K. Chang, βDetermination of locations and sizes for active power line conditioners to reduce harmonics in power systems,β IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1610β1617, 1996.
[14] W. K. Chang and W. M. Grady, βMinimizing harmonic voltage distortion with multiple current-constrained active power line conditioners,β IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 837β843, 1997.
[15] I. Ziari and A. Jalilian, βA new approach for allocation and sizing of multiple active power-line conditioners,β IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 1026β1035, 2010.
[16] K. Kennedy, G. Lightbody, R. Yacamini, M. Murray, and J. Kennedy, βOnline control of an APLC for network-wide harmonic reduction,β IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 432β439, 2006.
[17] K. Kennedy, G. Lightbody, R. Yacamini, M. Murray, and J. Kennedy, βDevelopment of a network-wide harmonic control scheme using an active filter,β IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 1847β1856, 2007.
[18] H. A. Ramos-Carranza and A. Medina, βSingle-harmonic active power line conditioner for harmonic distortion control in power networks,β IET Power Electronics, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 2218β2226, 2014.
[19] B. Singh, K. Al-Haddad, and A. Chandra, βA universal active power filter for single-phase reactive power and harmonic compensation,β in Proc. Power Quality Conf. (Power Quality β98), Hyderabad, India, pp. 81β87, 1998.
[20] W. Oliveira and P. M. Santos, βTransformerless single-phase universal active power filter for harmonic and reactive power compensation,β IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 3563β3572, 2014.
[21] T. B. Kumar and M. V. G. Rao, βMitigation of harmonics and power quality enhancement for SEIG-based wind farm using ANFIS-based STATCOM,β in Proc. Int. Conf. Smart Electric Grid (ISEG), Guntur, India, pp. 1β7, 2014.
[22] B. B. Ambati and V. Khadkikar, βOptimal sizing of UPQC considering VA loading and maximum utilization of power electronic converters,β IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1490β1498, 2014.
[23] V. Khadkikar and A. Chandra, βUPQC-S: A novel concept of simultaneous voltage sag/swell and load reactive power compensation utilizing series inverter of UPQC,β IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 2414β2425, 2011.
[24] S. Ganguly, βMulti-objective planning for reactive power compensation of radial distribution networks with unified power quality conditioner allocation using particle swarm optimization,β IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1801β1810, 2014.
[25] D. Das, D. P. Kothari, and A. Kalam, βSimple and efficient method for load flow solution of radial distribution networks,β International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 335β346, 1995.
[26] M. Moghbel and M. A. S. Masoum, βD-STATCOM based on hysteresis current control to improve voltage profile of distribution systems with PV solar power,β in Proc. Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conf. (AUPEC), Brisbane, QLD, Australia, pp. 1β5, 2016.
[27] A. Fereidouni, βShunt Active Power Filter Enhancement Using Advanced Control and Modulation Techniques,β Ph.D. dissertation, Curtin University, Perth, Australia, 2016.
[28] Australian Standard Voltage Levels, AS 60038-2012. [Online]. Available: http://infostore.saiglobal.com.au
[29] Y. del Valle, G. K. Venayagamoorthy, S. Mohagheghi, J. C. Hernandez, and R. G. Harley, βParticle swarm optimization: Basic concepts, variants and applications in power systems,β IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 171β195, 2008.
Cite this article
APA
Kripa Shanker, Dr. Dharmendra Kumar Singh (June 2026). Coordinated Operation of Custom Power Devices for Enhanced Voltage Quality and Harmonic Mitigation in Smart Distribution Networks. International Journal of Engineering and Techniques (IJET), 12(3). https://doi.org/{{doi}}
Kripa Shanker, Dr. Dharmendra Kumar Singh, βCoordinated Operation of Custom Power Devices for Enhanced Voltage Quality and Harmonic Mitigation in Smart Distribution Networks,β International Journal of Engineering and Techniques (IJET), vol. 12, no. 3, June 2026, doi: {{doi}}.
