Submit your paper : editorIJETjournal@gmail.com

Paper Title : Disturbance Rejection of a Highly Oscillating Third-Order Process using an I-PD Controller

ISSN : 2395-1303
Year of Publication : 2021
10.29126/23951303/IJET-V7I1P6

Authors: Galal Ali Hassaan , Mohamed Ramadan Mohamed

         


Abstract
- The objective of this paper is to investigate the possibility of using an I-PD controller for disturbance rejection associated with a highly oscillating third order process. The MATLAB control and optimization toolboxes are used to tune the I-PD controller using five error-based objective functions. The best objective function for this control application is assigned. . The effectiveness of using the I-PD controller is quantitatively evaluated through comparing with using PID and PD-PI controllers.

Reference
1. S. Skogestad, "Probably the best simple PID tuning rules in the world. "AIChE Annual Meeting, Reno, Nevada, p. 27, 2001. 2. S. Skogestad, "Simple analytic rules for model reduction and PID controller tuning." Journal of Process Control, vol. 13, pp. 291-309, 2003. 3. K. Sorensen, W. Singhose and S. Dickerson, "A controller enabling precise positioning and sway reduction in bridge and gantry cranes. "Control Engineering Practice, vol. 15, pp. 825-837, 2007. 4. R. Matusu, R. Prokop and J. Vojtesek, "Control of systems with time varying delay: an algebraic approach versus modified Smith predictors." In 17th International Conference on Process Control. Strbske Pleso, Slovakia. p. 5, 2009. 5. G. Herbst, "A simulative study on active disturbance rejection control as a control tool for practitioners." Electronics, vol. 2, pp. 246-279, 2013. 6. G. A. Hassaan, “Tuning of a PI-PD controller used with highly oscillating second order process”, International Journal of Research in Innovative Technology, vol.1, issue 5, pp.67-69, 2014. 7. G. A. Hassaan, " Disturbance rejection associated with a highly oscillating second-order process; part II: PD-PI controller", Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 1, issue 7, pp. 102-107, July 2015. 8. G. A. Hassaan, "Controller tuning for disturbance rejection associated with delayed double integrating process, Part IV: PID plus first order lag controller." International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science & Technology, vol. 3, issue 3, pp. 67-71, July 2015. 9. G. A. Hassaan, "Disturbance rejection with highly oscillating second-order-like process, part V: 2DOF PID-PI controller " International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Research Technology, vol. 1, issue 3, pp. 19-22, September 2015. 10. G. A. Hassaan, "Controller tuning for disturbance rejection associated with a delayed double integrating process, Part V: 2DOF controller." International Journal of Engineering and Technology, vol. 1, issue 3, pp. 26-31, September 2015. 11. G. A. Hassaan, "Controller tuning for disturbance rejection associated with delayed double integrating process, Part VI: PI-P controller." International Journal of Advanced Research in Management, Architecture, Technology and Engineering (IJARMATE), vol. 1, issue 1, pp. 1-5, August 2015. 12. G. A. Hassaan, " Compensator tuning for disturbance rejection associated with delayed double integrating processes, part 1:feed-backPD compensator", World Journal of Engineering research and Technology (WJERT), vol. 1, issue 1, pp. 27-36, 2015. 13. G. A. Hassaan, “Controller tuning for disturbance rejection associated with delayed double integrating processes, Part II: I-PD controller”, International Journal of Science and Engineering, vol.1, issue 3, pp.1-8, 2015. 14. G. A. Hassaan, “Disturbance rejection with a highly oscillating second-order-like processes, part VI:PPI controller”, International Journal of Science and Engineering, vol.1, issue 9, pp.20-27, 2015. 15. K. Shin, "Design and implementation of dynamic attitude control of continuous track system using gyro sensors." International Journal of Control and Automation, vol. 8, pp. 221-230, 2015. 16. L. Sun, D. Li and K. Lee, "Optimal disturbance rejection for PI controller with constraints on relative delay margin", ISA Transactions, vol.63, pp.103-111, July 2016. 17. J. Cvejn, "Enhancing disturbance rejection performance for the magnitude-optimum-tuned PI controller ", 21st International Conference on Process Control, Slovakia, June 2017. 18. S. Tavakoli, J. Sadeghi, I. Griffin and P.J. Fleming, " PI controller tuning for load disturbance rejection using constrained optimization ", International Journal Dynamics control, vol.6, issue 1, pp.188-199, 2018. 19. H. Niu, Q. Gao, Z. Liu, S.Tang and W. Guan, " Improved linear active disturbance rejection control for lever-type electric erection system with varying loads and low-resolution encoder ", Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol.2019, Article ID 9867467, 13 pages, 2019. 20. D. Liu, Q. Gao, Z. Chen and Z. Liu, "Linear Active Disturbance Rejection Control of a Two-Degrees-of-Freedom Manipulator", Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol.2020, Article ID 6969207,19 pages, 2020. 21. A. F. Singer, G. A. Hassaan and M. A. Elgamil, "Disturbance rejection for a third order process controlled by a PD-PI controller”, International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering Development, Volume 3, Issue 2,2020. 22. M. R. Mohamed, G. A. Hassaan,” Tuning of an I-PD controller for use with a third-order oscillating process”, International journal of computer techniques, Vol7, issue 4, pp.1-6, 2020. 23. C. Lopez, MATLAB control system engineering, Springer, 2014. 24. C. Lopez, MATLAB optimization techniques, Springer, 2014.

Keywords
I-PD controller tuning, disturbance rejection, control system performance..